ANSWERS TO SOME ARGUMENTS OF PERLIAMENTALISM.
THE OLIGARCHS OF PARLIAMENTARISM ALONG WITH THEIR SERVANTS LIE AND MISLEAD CROWD CEASELESSLY
The basic arguments (gawkiness) of oligarchs which aim at conscious-mental stupefaction of people are the following:
“Allow the politicians to govern. If the political party that governs doesn't fit you, if finally you believe that it has betrayed you ,
then you have the “democratic” right at the next elections (after 4 years) not to vote for this political party again”.
Fake smart asses and dastard murderers those who express these so deep nonsense.
Fine smart asses, so give your own property to someone else to manage as he likes.
And if he embezzles your property, then you will have your “democratic” right, not to give him again the management of your property.
Do you agree? Of course no. So shut up you morons.
“Nowadays societies have so huge population and the “direct” Democracy cannot be practiced (like in the city-state of the ancient times)”.
Haven't they understand in which “scientific” century we live?
They are in such a big confusion in their mind that they don't understand that nowadays with the scientific means that we have developed, the ability of the crowd to control the legislative power, is million times easier than it was in ancient times?
“We were elected from the people....”
A sentence that contains lies and deathly traps.
a)The truth is that no majority vote for them(the percentage is not over 50%) but even if 90% of the people had voted for them, they have no right to do something that finally the majority doesn't want.
b) and their trap is the following:
Even if the Knife cannot be determined as good or bad tool (you can cut bread but also you can stab someone), they try to present the elections in the minds of the working people as something good from default, so that they can execute their criminal plans.
The elections can be either oligarchic-fascist-criminal or democratic. (Oligarchic type or democratic type).
With the oligarchic-fascist-criminal elections they enforce on people to decide who are going to be those sick criminals, bullies-pimps, who are going in the future to prohibit people via violence to decide whatever concerns their social life.
They enforce them to decide that it is forbidden for them to decide again about the political scene of the country.
In the democratic elections on the other hand, people decide first of all every law or the provisions that they want to practice in their social relationships. And when they define the coordinators-governors of social matters (no rulers-masters-bullies-pimps), these are just means of enforcing the decisions of people and revocable at any time.
SO WE SAY NO TO THE OLIGARCHIC-MODERN FASCIST ELECTIONS OF PARLIAMENTARISM( MATTER OF VALUE)
“People have voted us”.
What else are we going to hear from you assholes? We have already mentioned that no majority voted for you. You are a minority elected through oligarchic type of elections
However “People have voted us” is a phrase unfinished and that's why misleading. The phrase more completed is : “People voted us to do.......”.
And the sequel to the phrase : “People voted us to do.......” hides the more significant truth. That’s how you must continue even if you are getting tough.
Why people voted for you?
For fun? So that people can see you stretching on the chairs of the Parliament? To do things that wanted only a small percentage of people or to things that the majority of people would like? For what reason?
Your answer too common: “to practice the political program that the majority of people wanted”.
Nice. And after they have voted you to practice your political program ( blah-blah ) that the majority of people supposed to prefer, now that you try to practice this political program, why the majority of people react against it?
Why they react against every law that you try to impose on them.
So we have three possible scenario.
a)You didn't lie before the elections (as you are scent people and you never promise things that you never make true.) What you have promised people that's exactly what people wanted , THEN
b)People THEN did not understand right what you were talking about. They did not understand your political program.
c)Even if people had understand well THEN, if they hadn't, NOW THEY HAVE REGRETTED.
Either in the one or in the other case who are you that are going against the final will of the majority of people and you don't practice their final will but you impose via violence your own will?
What are you going to lose if you practice the final will of the people? Which is your benefit and you don't practice their final will? As mocking you say that people rule. How can they rule, when they have no right to change their mind, regret for something?
Why don't you confirm through an irreproachable poll if they continue to want your program, if they still want the specific part of your program? (As people rule, then they can dislike a part of your political program.) So who are you that deny to change anything after the elections?
We are aware of the fact that you are modern oligarchs, modern fascists, the most criminal beast of human kind.
Additionally. What if people agree with 30% of one program, with 20% of an other, with 10% of an other etc. Why they have no right to select from different parties, but they have to accept via violence that implementation of the whole program of one specific political party?
It is as if someone wants to buy a pair of shoes and the salesman enforces him to buy the whole package(paying for all the followings)a car , a TV, two cell phones , a refrigerator , five underwear and one toothbrush.
Who are you that you put yourselves above people's will?
“We are the representatives of the people” the poisonous snakes keep on relentlessly to present the opposite from the one that they practice.
However in a representative relationship exists a) the one that gives orders and b) the one that executes the orders meaning the representative.
But when the one that has to receive and execute orders( the b) person) reverses the situation and he gives the orders to the (a) person (imagine the fruits would sell the greengrocer) then not only we have total dissolution of the representative relationship but we have a new relationship that is called pimp (that's why we have a whorehouse ), bullies that rule.
In the parliamentarian oligarchic dictatorship, people can not have representatives like in the real democracy but they impose on people only pimps, BULLIES.
To prove the truth.
E.g. Nowadays in our country people were those that gave the order to the new-fascists of the government to take these measures ( of IMF) or these new-fascists give blackmailing order to the people to implement the measures that a minority has decided?
(So much fun have some professors of Law School, when they teach their students the Parliament and every government are representatives of the people, representatives of the nation etc. Their humiliation is unlimited )
Sixth Gawkiness.( the greatest and most pitiful)
“As we have things like : free Will, elections, right to protest etc. so finally we have Democracy”.
The juggling of the most pervert people in each society create enormous amounts of stupidity.
1) If we put in a pan celery, carrots, salt, pepper, water etc. and we add no bins, can we say FINALLY that we have for real bean soup or a little bean soup?
2) If a woman does everything she has to do as to get pregnant but she can't make it , can we say in that case that the woman is FINALLY pregnant or a little pregnant?
3) If the surgeon does everything he is supposed to do according to scientific procedures but the patient dies, could we say in this case that FINALLY the operation was successful or at some part successful?
4) If we have democratic values like the free Will etc. but in the end a small percentage of people decides what happens in the society, which laws will be implemented and not the majority of people , THEN live we in a democratic society?
The sick Oligarchs along with their servants do this misleading, propagandistic campaign.
They make even the democratic values with the real meaning of Democracy
Despite the fact that the real meaning of Democracy or Oligarchy lies on who has the legislative Power, these sick people toss the ball not to the field but at the heads of the working people and they use some characteristics of Democracy in stead of the real meaning of it.
THE CRITERION TO MAKE DIFFERENCE FROM DEMOCRACY TO OLIGARCHY IS ONLY ONE: WHO HAS THE LEGISLATIVE POWER.
ONLY A FEW PEOPLE HAVE IT OR THE MAJORITY?
But with all the above juggling they have managed to confuse the mind not only simple working people but also people who consciously want to do something against the political system and they enforce them to look for the Democracy either in ways of electing rulers or somewhere else or even they force them to accept this current oligarchic system as Democracy and they name it Democracy, or urban Democracy or Representative Democracy etc.
(The sick Oligarchs feel so happy when they hear a working man call Parliamentary Democracy, as they feel that they have fulfilled their aim..
If they hear an anti-systemic fighter calling the Parliamentarism Democracy they cry from Happiness).
“The existence even a few democratic characteristics means that we have at least fragments of Democracy and along with fights, we can maximize, deepen them……….or isn’t that better than having nothing from these few democratic characteristics?”
Let us examine two compounds : H2O (water) and H2SO4 (sulfuric acid or vitriol)
However, as we can see, the H and the O2 are parts both of water and sulfuric acid (and they can help or destroy lives depends on which place they are in the compound.) So as two totally different compounds can have some common things, so two totally different political-economical systems can have some common things. It is possible even Democracy and Oligarchy to have common things as the almost free will etc.
(This thing exploit so perfect, years now, the criminals-oligarchs so as to classify their brutal oligarchic system in the category of Democracy and in this way they mislead people better .)
Water (H2O) is a compound that gives life. Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) is a compound that can destroy life.
The same thing happens with Democratic characteristics (rights). If they destroy or help lives depends on which system they are practiced.
This means: Who has finally the legislative power.
It belongs to a few people or in the majority?
The legislative power is the key. It’s the matching point.
It’s essential for every person that wants to have the control-power of the economy and general speaking the quality of social relationships.( the one that totally possess the legislative power can also possess the economical).
But to possess the legislative power, it’s important to control-possess the executive.
PS 1) What is the European Union (EU)?
A few years ago, a magazine had written who are the 30 more powerful people that take the most important decisions about the future of Europe.
We can accept that they are not just 30 but 500 or 1000.
That means that 1000 people decide about the lives of 500.000.000 people that live in Europe?
What kind of dictatorship is that? So we should call it not European Union but European Dictatorship of bullies.
(E.g. a few days ago they decided to allow the grow mutated potatoes). Who are these morons that decide about our own lives?
The people suffer under a universal, ECONOMICAL-POLITICAL oligarchic dictatorship that in the chairs of Parliament they wear the mask of Democracy.
2) we have to make these groups from now on in every country and we should be totally compatible in every field against the system and in the same time we should fight to overturn the system.
The total implementation of the people’s power can happen only after the total crush of the current oligarchic system.
GO FOR A UNIVERSAL ANTI-OLIGARCHIC MOVEMENT
THE CAPITALISM WITH HIS POLITICAL SYSTEMS AND THE GOVERNMENTAL CAPITALISM (STALINISM) WITH HIS POLITICAL SYSTEMS COMPLETED THEIR HISTORY.
THE NEW ONE HAS BEEN BORN. IT IS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME TO BE ORGANISED.
COILING AND FIGHT FOR THE REESTABLISHMENT OF THE CENTRAL PURPOSE OF THE MOVEMENT, FOR THE SOCIAL LIBERATION.
ALL THE LEGISLATIVE POWER SHOULD GO TO THE PEOPLE-UNCLASSIFIED SOCIETY.